Monthly Archive for September, 2005

On immediate withdrawl from Iraq

Here’s a convincing and thoughtful essay on why immediate withdrawl from Iraq makes sense, written by Michael Schwartz, Professor of Sociology at the State University of New York. It starts with an introduction from Tom Engelhardt, which includes:

Michael Schwartz makes the case, both simple and sophisticated, for withdrawing quickly from Iraq, but more than that for stopping thinking of ourselves as part of the solution—a bulwark, for instance, against an onrushing civil war—rather than part of the problem.

This lousy flag

Photo of 84 year old Milvertha Hendricks wrapped in the U.S. flag, taken by Alan Chin on the morning of Saturday, 3rd September at the Convention Center in New Orleans.
“I survived Hurricane Katrina but all I got was this lousy flag”

This is 84 year old Milvertha Hendricks, taken by Alan Chin on the morning of Saturday, 3rd September at the Convention Center in New Orleans. You can view more of Alan’s photographs at BAGnewsNotes.

It’s a risky business voting

It’s a risky business, voting. Generally the problem is you’re just encouraging them.

Over the years I’ve come to appreciate what many anarchists have known for a long time: parliament is an extremely useful tool for defusing democracy and channelling real struggles into safe dead-ends.

Many Last Straw readers know the score. They know that on Saturday in New Zealand’s General Election the vote they have represents an extremely limited form of democracy.

They generally know, sub-consciously or consciously, that parliament is a hierachical institution and that no matter what their diverse views may be on how society should be run, many of those views will never be represented by the political and economic elite, if for no other reason that investors and speculators (fat cats) bankroll many politicians and ultimately hold a veto over any general election, by threat of pulling their money out of the country. It’s a democracy, but there’s only one right answer.

So, it’s a long shot, voting, but if you’re going to do it there is just one party that demonstrates seriousness, vision and pragmatism about the future we all face and and that’s the Green Party. You need only compare their policies with the policies of other parties (or the lack thereof) to realise this. There is also an aspect of the Greens that goes a little way to helping me overcome my aversion to parliamentary democracy.

Appropriate Decision-making:
For the implementation of ecological wisdom and social responsibility, decisions will be made directly at the appropriate level by those affected.

This is one of four items of the founding document of the Green Party and, the way I read it, means the eventual dismantling of parliament with new participatory economic and political institutions taking its place. Cher.

So, if you’re going to vote on Saturday, remember your actions have consequences. If you want to live in a New Zealand where its people will be at war with each other; a country where you can open the paper each day and feel the bigotry and resentment flow then you need to vote National or NZ First.

If you’re not up for voting against your interests, or the interests of coming generations, then give your party vote to the Greens. Or you might like to follow Matt McCarten’s advice in September 11th’s The Herald on Sunday, explaining how to vote tactically for a centre-left Government:

There is no doubt that this election is close and no one wants to waste their vote. I’m constantly asked by people how they should use their two votes to ensure a centre-left government. In the partisan interest of helping the centre-left I offer the following tactical guide to killing the right at this election.

Obviously Labour needs to get over 40 per cent of the party vote to have any chance to govern. From their point of view they would like to get to 45 per cent. You can add Jim Anderton to their number. But they will still need the Greens. As I say to soft Green supporters who are thinking of voting Labour, if Labour gets 44 per cent of the party vote and the Greens get 5 per cent of the party vote, that equals 49 per cent. That means that with Anderton they can govern. But if Labour gets 44.1 per cent and the Greens get 4.9 per cent, that equals 44.1 per cent. Let me spell it out even clearer: If the Greens go under 5 per cent they get no seats in parliament at all and Brash becomes Prime Minister. So if you’re a soft Green or an independent and want a Labour-Green government, you should give your party vote to the Greens. If you’re a die-hard Labourite then, of course, vote Labour.

More worryingly for the centre-left, Winston has been trying to come back into the game in the past few days. Winston’s position is that he will support either National or Labour on the basis of which of them gets the most seats. This is music to National’s ears and validates their election strategy to go for broke to win the entire centre-right bloc’s party vote. It meant killing Act, but it’s not like Act supporters have anyone else to vote for. The National campaign is now to get more party votes than Labour. If they achieve this, Brash gets Peter Dunne and New Zealand First and that’s enough to govern on current polling.

Therefore, it would be a dangerous thing now for National to tell Epsom voters to swing in behind Rodney Hide. If they do, then Act sympathisers who are currently supporting National outside Epsom will realise their party vote won’t be wasted. They will see that if Rodney wins Epsom they can swing back to Act who could then get 3-4 per cent of the party vote. But all of that vote comes directly off National in the all-important party vote. Winston and Dunne then are duty bound to support Labour in Government. So, sorry, Rodney, if National wants to win, it means you are history.

Normally the electorate vote has no meaning, but it does in this election. Tariana Turia, Anderton, Dunne and Peters all hold seats and if they win, all their party votes will count and their supporters may well determine the outcome.

So this is how you vote to keep out the right if you are a voter in the following electorates.

Wigram: Labour needs Anderton to win his seat so give him your electorate vote. But his Progressive Party isn’t rating more than 0.5 per cent, so any party vote for his party is wasted. Give it to either Labour or the Greens.

Tauranga: Winston will back Brash if he gets back and National gets more votes. Even if he backs Labour he’ll stop any progressive policy being advanced. If Winston loses the seat and NZ First goes under 5 per cent in the party vote, then Winston and all his MPs go down. Therefore, you hold your nose and give your electorate vote to the National candidate so Winston loses Tauranga.

Epsom: If Hide can’t win this seat then Act is finished. Labour needs to let their supporters tactically vote for Richard Worth.

Ohariu-Belmont: Dunne is safe here, but if he has no other MPs after the election then he will be able to be ignored. Don’t vote for United Future as they will go with National if they can.

Te Tai Haururu: Tariana Turia is safe here. Current polling suggests the Maori Party can nationally get only one or two MPs off their party list, but given that they will win four electorates, at least, all their party votes will be wasted. The Maori Party will not support National and recent polls show that Labour may well need the Maori Party. Maori seat voters should give their electorate vote to the Maori Party electorate candidate. That way the Maori Party will win all seven seats and lock Brash out of government. Maori voters should give their party vote to the Greens. after all, if the Greens get back they will be in government. Having an ally around the cabinet table would be a good thing.

If the left votes strategically then they should win, even it’s tight.

What Sky News thinks of Bush

No I haven’t vanished, it’s just that the UK summer decided to make an appearance. I think it’s probably over now so, don’t despair, I’ll be back to spam your inbox with my extremist terrorist-sympathising text in short order! In the mean time I thought you might enjoy this little puppy (Hat tip: David MacClement):

Screenshot of Katrina Hurricane news item showing George W. Bush, with caption: BUSH: ONE OF THE WORST DISASTERS TO HIT U.S.
As described on Snopes, it’s a screenshot from Sky News.

I’ve often argued that George is more a symptom of our problems than a cause of them and that those of us working toward a world free of incompetent weasals at the wheel should focus more on the authoritarian institutions that flourish around us. These days I’m much more inclined to think Junior needs a bullet to the head (but not before Tony of course).