October 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Sep   Nov »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Month October 2008

Undecided

David Sedaris, on unde­cided voters (via Dar­ing Fire­ball):

To put them in per­spect­ive, I think of being on an air­plane. The flight attend­ant comes down the aisle with her food cart and, even­tu­ally, parks it beside my seat. “Can I interest you in the chicken?” she asks. “Or would you prefer the plat­ter of shit with bits of broken glass in it?”

To be unde­cided in this elec­tion is to pause for a moment and then ask how the chicken is cooked.

So long, suckers

Price­less. Andrew Clark, for the Guard­ian:

The boss of a suc­cess­ful US hedge fund has quit the industry with an extraordin­ary farewell let­ter dis­miss­ing his rivals as over-privileged “idi­ots” and thank­ing “stu­pid” traders for mak­ing him rich.

Yes­ter­day the 37-year-old told his cli­ents that he had hated the busi­ness and had only been in it for the money. And after declar­ing he would no longer man­age money for other people, because he had enough of his own, Lahde said that instead he inten­ded to repair his stress-damaged health; he made it clear he would not miss the fin­an­cial world.

The low-hanging fruit, ie idi­ots whose par­ents paid for prep school, Yale and then the Har­vard MBA, was there for the tak­ing,” he wrote. “These people who were (often) truly not worthy of the edu­ca­tion they received (or sup­posedly received) rose to the top of com­pan­ies such as AIG, Bear Ste­arns and Leh­man Broth­ers and all levels of our gov­ern­ment,” he said.

All of this beha­viour sup­port­ing the aris­to­cracy only ended up mak­ing it easier for me to find people stu­pid enough to take the other side of my trades. God bless America.”

Lahde became one of the biggest names in the invest­ment industry when one of his funds pro­duced a return of 866% last year, largely by fore­cast­ing the US home loans industry would collapse.

In his farewell let­ter, which con­cluded with an appeal for the leg­al­isa­tion of marijuana, Lahde said he was happy with his rewards and did not envy those who had made even more money.

I will let oth­ers try to amass nine, 10 or 11 fig­ure net worths. Mean­while, their lives suck,” he wrote, cit­ing a life of back-to-back busi­ness appoint­ments relieved only by a two-week annual hol­i­day in which fin­an­ci­ers are still “glued to their Blackberries”.

The 11th Hour, a must see documentary

The 11th Hour film posterThe 11th Hour is a doc­u­ment­ary film, co-written and nar­rated by Leonardo DiCaprio, but don’t let that put you off. This is one of the best envir­on­mental doc­u­ment­ar­ies I’ve seen and DiCaprio does a fine job.

Inter­mingled with a rous­ing mont­age of earthly images and audio, the back­bone of the film is a series of inter­views with over fifty politi­cians, sci­ent­ists, and envir­on­mental act­iv­ists — includ­ing Stephen Hawk­ing and David Suzukiwho clev­erly explain the com­plex bind we’re in, how we got here and how we might get out of it.

It’s a treas­ure trove of quot­able dia­logue, and after detail­ing the down right depress­ing situ­ation we’re in and the obstacles we need to over­come, the most inspir­ing stuff comes in the last seg­ment where we are presen­ted not only with prac­tical ideas and solu­tions for the future but with a whole new way of look­ing at our situ­ation; this gem from Paul Hawken:

The great thing about the dilemma we’re in is that we get to reima­gine every single thing we do. In other words there isn’t one single thing that we make or sys­tem that we have that doesn’t require a com­plete remake, and so there are two ways of look­ing at that. One is, like, oh my gosh, you know, what a big bur­den. The other way to look at it, which is the way I prefer, is what a great time to be born, what a great time to be alive, because this gen­er­a­tion gets to essen­tially com­pletely change this world.

If I was a film­maker this is the film I’d like to make.

Good news: UK turns to Keynesian economics

With New Labour’s neo-liberal agenda and long record of social­ising costs and privat­ising profits it comes as a sur­prise to me that Alistair Darling has turned to Keynes in the face of reces­sion. I had assumed until now that they’d use this reces­sion and the recent handout to bankers as an oppor­tun­ity to cut back on social spend­ing. Maybe we have the absence of Tony Blair to thank?

While I’ve increas­ingly been hear­ing news of archi­tects being laid off over the past few weeks, the firm I’m employed by works nearly exclus­ively in the social hous­ing sec­tor, so it’s cer­tainly good eco­nomic news for me:

The chan­cel­lor said hous­ing, energy and small busi­nesses would bene­fit in his new spend­ing plans.

And I couldn’t agree more with Darling on this statement:

This is a time when you have to sup­port the eco­nomy. You will see us switch­ing our spend­ing pri­or­it­ies to areas which make a difference.

It’s just a shame he includes in this the entrench­ment of the military-industrial com­plex and the myopic decision to upgrade Britain’s nuc­lear weapons.

… plans for two air­craft car­ri­ers and a new nuc­lear deterrent would go ahead.

I might add that a decision to upgrade Britain’s nuc­lear weapons is a dir­ect viol­a­tion of the Nuc­lear Non-Proliferation Treaty, some­thing the UK and U.S. gov­ern­ments have been falsely accus­ing Iran of over the past year or so.

Is the problem really greedy bankers?

Simon Bowers repor­ted yes­ter­day that Wall Street bankers are to take $70bn in bonuses this year, 10% of the U.S. gov­ern­ment handout. It’s a mis­take, how­ever, to blame the fin­an­cial melt­down on bankers and their greed. These people are simply fol­low­ing the rationale of the cap­it­al­ist sys­tem: take as much as you can, irre­spect­ive of the expense incurred to others.

If you think it’s scan­dal­ous to take such bonuses, espe­cially in the cur­rent cli­mate, as I do, then blame the scan­dal­ous frame­work they work within, not them for work­ing within the framework.

I got talk­ing to a home­less guy on the street the other day. He joked to me about how mean­ing­less this crisis is to him, and while the cur­rent situ­ation could make his pre­dic­a­ment far worse I took his point: for a large num­ber of people on this planet — about 80% of the pop­u­la­tion — cap­it­al­ism is per­petu­ally in crisis. Every day. What makes this a “crisis” is that a large por­tion of the other 20% are get­ting fucked too.

Some good news on the Bush regime’s war crimes

Sher­wood Ross, for Yubanet: Steer­ing Com­mit­tee to pur­sue the pro­sec­u­tion for war crimes of Pres­id­ent Bush and culp­able high-ranking aides after they leave office Jan. 20th.

Israeli best seller challenges Zionism

Jonathan Cook on Dr. Shlomo Sand’s new book:

Dr. Shlomo Sand argues that the idea of a Jew­ish nation — whose need for a safe haven was ori­gin­ally used to jus­tify the found­ing of the state of Israel — is a myth inven­ted little more than a cen­tury ago.

In addi­tion, he argues that the Jews were never exiled from the Holy Land, that most of today’s Jews have no his­tor­ical con­nec­tion to the land called Israel and that the only polit­ical solu­tion to the country’s con­flict with the Palestini­ans is to abol­ish the Jew­ish state.

… he pre­dicted a rough ride from the pro-Israel lobby when the book is launched … in the United States next year.

In con­trast, he said Israelis had been, if not exactly sup­port­ive, at least curi­ous about his argument.

Some people have a cheek

In the Guard­ian today:

Under the government’s bail-out terms Lloyds and RBS are unable to pay dividends to their share­hold­ers until pref­er­ence shares sold to the gov­ern­ment are paid off. This could take up to five years — some­thing that Lloyds share­hold­ers are par­tic­u­larly angry about, as they are used to receiv­ing healthy twice-yearly pay­ments from the bank.

It’s not good enough that tax­pay­ers are sav­ing their ass, they want to profit dir­ectly from it too. 

NZ Election: Rodney Hide chasing the redneck vote

No Right Turn on Rod­ney Hide’s recent com­ments about the Maori Party and its poten­tial to influ­ence the next government.

U.S. subjugation of Iraq and the spoils of war

Shortly after the U.S.-led inva­sion of Iraq in 2003 I wrote this opin­ion piece, which was pub­lished in my homet­own news­pa­per, Hawke’s Bay Today, in New Zea­l­and. It promp­ted this response, by way of let­ter to the editor, from Har­die Mar­tin:

After read­ing his Opin­ion in Hawke’s Bay Today on April 12, it occurs to me that any­one seek­ing a Min­is­ter of (dis)Information of the same cal­ibre as Iraq’s Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, need look no fur­ther than Chris­ti­aan Briggs.

I won­der what Har­die Mar­tin would make of today’s occu­pa­tion of Iraq:

US using debts to black­mail Iraq:

Bagh­dad is under pres­sure by Wash­ing­ton to accept the secur­ity deal in exchange for clear­ing all of Iraq’s debts,” Iraqi law­maker Mohammed Kamid al-Humedawi told Press TV on Wed­nes­day. The US will be allowed to set up per­man­ent mil­it­ary bases, if Iraq signs the agree­ment. Under the deal the US forces will also be gran­ted immunity from legal pro­sec­u­tion inside their bases in Iraq. 

Iraqi gov­ern­ment fuels ‘war for oil’ the­or­ies by put­ting reserves up for biggest ever sale:

The biggest ever sale of oil assets will take place today, when the Iraqi gov­ern­ment puts 40bn bar­rels of recov­er­able reserves up for offer in Lon­don. BP, Shell and Exxon­Mobil are all expec­ted to attend a meet­ing at the Park Lane Hotel in May­fair with the Iraqi oil min­is­ter, Hus­sein al-Shahristani. Access is being given to eight fields, rep­res­ent­ing about 40% of the Middle East­ern nation’s reserves, at a time when the coun­try remains under occu­pa­tion by US and Brit­ish forces. Two smal­ler agree­ments have already been signed with Shell and the China National Pet­ro­leum Cor­por­a­tion, but today’s sale will ignite argu­ments over whether the over­throw of Sad­dam Hus­sein was a “war for oil” that is now to be con­sum­mated by west­ern mul­tina­tion­als seiz­ing con­trol of stra­tegic Iraqi reserves.