May 2009
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Apr   Jun »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Month May 2009

This doesn’t sound good

Cath­er­ine Philp, report­ing for The Times:

… 200,000 Tamil civil­ians [are] being held against their will behind the razor-wire coils that sur­round Manik Farm, the largest dis­place­ment camp in Sri Lanka — one of the largest in the world.

At Manik Farm, the boys — and some girls — of fight­ing age were sep­ar­ated for screen­ing and have not been seen since.

Photos of Tamils at Menik farm

Iran may not want the bomb

Fareed Zakaria writ­ing for New­s­week:

… over the last five years, senior Ira­nian offi­cials at every level have repeatedly asser­ted that they do not intend to build nuc­lear weapons. Pres­id­ent Mah­moud Ahmad­ine­jad has quoted the regime’s found­ing father, Ayatol­lah Ruhol­lah Khomeini, who asser­ted that such weapons were “un-Islamic.” The country’s Supreme Leader, Ayatol­lah Ali Khame­nei, issued a fatwa in 2004 describ­ing the use of nuc­lear weapons as immoral. In a sub­sequent ser­mon, he declared that “devel­op­ing, pro­du­cing or stock­pil­ing nuc­lear weapons is for­bid­den under Islam.” Last year Khame­nei reit­er­ated all these points after meet­ing with the head of the Inter­na­tional Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei. Now, of course, they could all be lying. But it seems odd for a regime that derives its legit­im­acy from its fidel­ity to Islam to declare con­stantly that these weapons are un-Islamic if it intends to develop them. It would be far shrewder to stop remind­ing people of Khomeini’s state­ments and stop issu­ing new fat­was against nukes.

The Telegraph’s interview with MPs’ benefit fraud whistleblower

The Daily Telegraph’s inter­view with John Wick, UK MPs’ expenses bene­fit fraud whistleblower:

There were three ver­sions [of the MPs’ expenses data­base] … there was an unre­dac­ted ver­sion and two redac­ted versions.

We’ve reached a stage in soci­ety where they want to know everything about us. I think we’re entitled to know about them.

I like the way the Tele­graph has gone about pub­lish­ing this mater­ial. If they’d pub­lished it all at once the story may have faded away and there wouldn’t be as big­ger shit storm as there is.

Update: Title updated for accur­acy and context.

The downward spiral of UK’s major political parties

Quarter of voters set to reject main parties at EU elec­tions, a Guardian/ICM sur­vey finds.

That’s still a lot of suck­ers out there. I still can’t fathom why they didn’t reject them after they took their coun­try to war on a pack of lies.

The next iPhone

John Gruber, with prob­ably the most reli­able low-down on the next iPhone, due to arrive in July.

And, in the mean time, work­ers appeal to Apple dir­ectly to end iPhone supplier’s labour abuse.

Freedom and equality joined at the hip

Cos­tas Douz­i­nas on free­dom and equal­ity:

Let me start with a social­ist axiom … : free­dom can­not flour­ish without equal­ity and equal­ity does not exist without freedom.

While logic­ally and philo­soph­ic­ally insep­ar­able, equal­ity and liberty have fol­lowed dif­fer­ent and even opposed tra­ject­or­ies. For lib­er­al­ism, free­dom in its neg­at­ive and pos­it­ive forms is primary. Neg­at­ive free­dom is cap­tured in Hobbes’s state­ment that liberty is the absence of “external imped­i­ments”. The pos­it­ive “free­dom to”, on the other hand, was clas­sic­ally defined by Isaiah Ber­lin: “I wish my life and decisions to depend on myself, not on external forces of whatever kind … to be the instru­ment of my own, not of other men’s acts of will.”

Or as I once put on a t-shirt:

Anarch­ism, the name given to a struggle for a soci­ety char­ac­ter­ised by the abil­ity of each actor to have a say in out­comes pro­por­tion­ate to the degree they are affected by them.

You gotta love the Norwegians

Landon Thomas Jr. in the New York Times:

Nor­way is … a major oil exporter [and] Even though prices have sharply declined, the gov­ern­ment is not par­tic­u­larly wor­ried. That is because Nor­way avoided the usual trap that plagues many energy-rich countries.

Instead of spend­ing its riches lav­ishly, it passed legis­la­tion ensur­ing that oil rev­enue went straight into its sov­er­eign wealth fund, state money that is used to make invest­ments around the world. Now its sov­er­eign wealth fund is close to being the largest in the world …

Norway’s rel­at­ive frugal­ity stands in stark con­trast to Bri­tain, which spent most of its North Sea oil rev­enue — and more — dur­ing the boom years. Gov­ern­ment spend­ing rose to 47 per­cent of G.D.P., from 42 per­cent in 2003. By com­par­ison, pub­lic spend­ing in Nor­way fell to 40 per­cent from 48 per­cent of G.D.P.

The U.S. and the U.K. have no sense of guilt,” said Anders Aslund, an expert on Scand­inavia at the Peterson Insti­tute for Inter­na­tional Eco­nom­ics in Washington.

Eirik Wekre, an eco­nom­ist … describes Nor­we­gi­ans’ feel­ings about debt this way: “We can­not spend this money now; it would be steal­ing from future generations.”

The main problem with Wolfram Alpha

John Timmer’s take on Wolfram Alpha:

… the biggest issue is that, in the pro­cess of cre­at­ing the data store behind Alpha, all the con­text behind a num­ber — who pro­duced it, what were their meth­ods, how was the raw data obtained, is the num­ber actu­ally rel­ev­ant for a given ana­lysis, etc. — is stripped …

The train wreck that was Donald Rumsfeld

Fas­cin­at­ing art­icle on Don­ald Rums­feld in GQ magazine that will make you cringe.

Wolfram Alpha, a new way to find facts

Wolfram Alpha is a new search engine you’re likely to hear a lot more about and it went live with a test run today. It’s not a search engine in the same way as Google, which indexes and searches web­sites, but an answer search engine, which indexes and com­putes facts.

Wolfram Alpha about page:

Wolfram|Alpha is the first step in an ambi­tious, long-term pro­ject to make all sys­tem­atic know­ledge imme­di­ately com­put­able by any­one.  You enter your ques­tion or cal­cu­la­tion, and Wolfram|Alpha uses its built-in algorithms and grow­ing col­lec­tion of data to com­pute the answer.  Based on a new kind of knowledge-based computing.

Theodore Gray of Wolfram Research describes the secret behind Wolfram Alpha:

The secret weapon that has allowed us, and no one else, to assemble such a vast lib­rary of algorithms, in such a diverse range of fields, is Math­em­at­ica.

Math­em­at­ica is famil­iar to sci­ent­ists and engin­eers as the most power­ful, most gen­eral tool for sci­entific com­pu­ta­tion, a role it has played since Ver­sion 1 was released in 1988.