But I’m innocent!

I was sit­ting right up the back of the bus this morn­ing on my way to work, one of those buses where the second-to-back seat faces toward the back one. To my left was some other bloke and sit­ting on the seat facing us were two of route 29’s many god­desses, a joy­ful morning’s bus ride to be sure. Until, that is, someone far­ted. It was pretty aver­age, noth­ing too offens­ive, but def­in­itely male. There was a bit of nose-screwing and eye-shifting until one of the girls went for the win­dow. I was attempt­ing to ignore the escal­at­ing situ­ation, con­tinu­ing to read my book, when, out of the corner of my eye, I see the bloke shoot me a quick glance. And then another. I can’t believe it, the cheeky fucker. A smile breaks across my face at his auda­city. I’m start­ing to laugh now, but its too late, the god­desses won’t have a bar of it. I’m left car­ry­ing the can. As I get off at my stop I catch a final glance; he’s smirk­ing and for some reason all I can think of is Tony Blair.

Accord­ing to FAIR the Smoking Gun Memo is going mostly unre­por­ted in the U.S., while Tom Engel­hardt points out that a report by Mark Dan­ner in the 9 June issue of the New York Review of Books, will be the first U.S. print pub­lic­a­tion to pub­lish the full Memo:

That a “smoking gun” doc­u­ment about the nature of the war in the mak­ing has appeared in this fash­ion, not in Kyrgyz­stan but in Eng­land; that no one in the Brit­ish or Amer­ican gov­ern­ments has even bothered to dis­pute its proven­ance or accur­acy; and that, with a few hon­or­able excep­tions like colum­nist Molly Ivins, that gun was allowed to lie on the ground smoking for days, hardly com­men­ted upon, tells us much about our present moment.

Howard Zinn, one of the United States’ more sane cit­izens, touches on the ori­gins of Amer­ican nation­al­ism, and how, when mixed with unbridled power, it has lead to one of the Yank’s more, uh, endear­ing traits: Amer­ican excep­tion­al­ism.

Our cit­izenry has been brought up to see our nation as dif­fer­ent from oth­ers, an excep­tion in the world, uniquely moral, expand­ing into other lands in order to bring civil­iz­a­tion, liberty, democracy.

That self-deception star­ted early. When the first Eng­lish set­tlers moved into Indian land in Mas­sachu­setts Bay and were res­isted, the viol­ence escal­ated into war with the Pequot Indi­ans. The killing of Indi­ans was seen as approved by God, the tak­ing of land as com­manded by the Bible.

One of the effects of nation­al­ist think­ing is a loss of a sense of pro­por­tion. The killing of 2,300 people at Pearl Har­bor becomes the jus­ti­fic­a­tion for killing 240,000 in Hiroshima and Naga­saki. The killing of 3,000 people on Septem­ber 11 becomes the jus­ti­fic­a­tion for killing tens of thou­sands of people in Afgh­anistan and Iraq.

We need to assert our alle­gi­ance to the human race, and not to any one nation. We need to refute the idea that our nation is dif­fer­ent from, mor­ally super­ior to, the other imper­ial powers of world history.

And Andrew Buncombe of the Inde­pend­ent reports on the AWOL crisis hit­ting the U.S. military:

As the death toll of troops mounts in Iraq and Afgh­anistan, America’s mil­it­ary recruit­ing fig­ures have plummeted to an all-time low. Thou­sands of US ser­vice­men and women are now refus­ing to serve their country.

Add Your Comments

Disclaimer
Your email is never published nor shared.
Required
Required
Tips

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <ol> <ul> <li> <strong>

Ready?