Archive for the 'Politics' Category

‘There’s going to be a lot of hurt for a lot of people’

Oh New Zealand, what have you done? Roger Douglas on election night fantasising about the mandate he thinks he has:

We have to make some changes and there’s going to be a lot of hurt for a lot of people.

What a cheek, coming from the scoundrel who lied his way into government in the eighties, unleashing an economic revolution without a democratic mandate, selling off New Zealand’s resources and devastating our democracy by stripping away government control over the flow of capital, effectively handing over the keys of democracy to private investors who can choose at any time to sink the country’s economy by moving capital out of the country if government policy is not conducive to their “business needs.”

2008 NZ election: garbage in, garbage out

In a representative democracy it’s not democracy’s purpose to produce good government but to produce representative government. While I don’t expect much in the way of democracy from representative democracy1 enough New Zealanders voted against their interests on Saturday to elect into government a multimillionaire merchant banker Prime Minister and his self-interested fat cat accomplices, including some of those who wreaked havoc on the New Zealand economy in the eighties and nineties. As a result New Zealanders can expect, amongst other things, a nastier society, a less fair society, more crime, more prisons, lower wages, more involvement in futile and immoral wars, a decline in the environment and less democracy. Garbage in, garbage out.2

As you can tell, I’m over the moon that enough New Zealanders had, shall we say, the confidence to vote National (and ACT!) on Saturday. They must have missed my memo.

Notes:
  1. New Zealand’s current voting system requires the formation of a coalition representing a majority of voters to form a government. While this is something to be relatively proud of compared to the more common system of plurality voting, which requires only that a group receive the largest bloc of votes to form a government, we still end up with an extremely limited form of democracy.

    While there are things we could do to improve our voting system, such as moving away from having two large parties and getting rid of the absurd 5% threshold which can disenfrachise hundreds of thousands of voters, there’s no getting away from the inherent problems of representative democracy, such as the tyranny of simple majority rules (let alone plurality rules) and the fact that voting for people to represent your interests is the least effective means of applying political power and arguably a contradiction; no one can truly represent your power and interests for you. You can only have power by exercising it and you can only truly know what your interests are by involving yourself in the attendance of them.

    In any case, I don’t think it’s any coincidence that the self-described democracies of the world using plurality voting systems are some of the least equitable, the largest arms dealers and the largest polluters. []

  2. A famous computer axiom meaning that if invalid data is entered into a system, the resulting output will also be invalid. []

Obama mania?

Michael Albert on the hope so many hold in Obama:

Some things are obvious. 

Electing a first African American President is world historic. 

The electorate bending toward sanity, eloquence, and dignity, rather than a death spiral into moronic depravity is positive, too, even if mostly because the alternative is a condition of abject horror. 

Realignment of various voting sectors and undercutting market mania are very positive, too.

My guess is, sadly, that within one week, literally one week, Obama’s staff and cabinet choices will make decisively evident that without mass activism forcing new outcomes, change will stop at the surface. I fervently hope I am wrong.

Please don’t let our democracy slip away NZ

There are a myriad of reasons I hope you don’t vote National this Saturday, such as their record on selling off the country or their keenness to send Kiwi kids off to get killed in illegal wars to curry favour, but if there’s just one reason it’s this: our democracy.

National wants to take away one of the things I’m most proud of about our country, our proportional electoral system, MMP.

“Representative democracy,” to my eyes, is a contradiction in terms and one day I hope we put this little stepping stone behind us and move onto the greener pastures of participatory democracy, but in the mean time a representative one is what we have and the move to MMP has made it enormously more effective as a democracy and given many more people a rightful say in the running of the country.

It’s something to be proud of and something I’ve really missed while living here in Britain. I have no doubt that if Britain and the U.S. had proportional voting systems, such as MMP, the Bush/Blair gang would never have been able to launch a war of aggression—the “supreme war crime“—against Iraq. And they may even have avoided the deregulation that led to the credit crunch.

If National gets their way we’ll go back to an undemocratic system where people who manage to gain power in parties like Labour and National can impose their narrow agendas on the rest of us at our expense. All the other really important things such as the economy, the environment and peace will cease to be matters up for debate. This is why the matter of democracy is so important.

You know what to do. Keep New Zealand democracy safe on Saturday, vote for somebody else.

The Daily Show: Speaking truth to power or setting the boundaries of acceptable debate?

I enjoy watching Jon Stewart’s The Daily Show but sometimes the confines of his liberal naivety drives me nuts.

Ian Sinclair on the problem with Jon Stewart:

Stewart is surely right to state the mainstream news media in the US is “hurting America”, as he did during a heated exchange on CNN’s now-defunct Crossfire in 2004. However, as a programme that is adversarial but always within very strict ideological boundaries, surely it is also true The Daily Show has its own role to play in what US dissident Noam Chomsky calls ‘the manufacture of consent’: “Thus far and no further”.