<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Last Straw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://last-straw.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://last-straw.net</link>
	<description>The weblog of Christiaan Briggs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 08:15:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by Mauricio</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56650</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauricio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 08:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56650</guid>
		<description>Why did we stop? Fight fire with fire(muslim extremists)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did we stop? Fight fire with fire(muslim extremists)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by James Eyre</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56649</link>
		<dc:creator>James Eyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56649</guid>
		<description>Who do you think you are Jean? The very reason America dropped the two bombs were because Japan had not surrendered! On August the 12th 1945 the emperor of Japan declared official surrender, 3 days AFTER the Nagasaki bomb which killed so many. Get your facts right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who do you think you are Jean? The very reason America dropped the two bombs were because Japan had not surrendered! On August the 12th 1945 the emperor of Japan declared official surrender, 3 days AFTER the Nagasaki bomb which killed so many. Get your facts right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Documentary: chemical weapons used on people in Iraq by jamez</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/documentary-phosphorus-and-firebombs-used-on-people-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-56648</link>
		<dc:creator>jamez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 07:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/2005/11/documentary-phosphorus-and-firebombs-used-on-people-in-iraq/#comment-56648</guid>
		<description>This is news to me. I was all over Fallujah during that time I never saw anyone burnt by Willie Pete. I did however see South African 155s everywhere I saw Iraqi suicide bombers target their own countrymen(and women children) in fact any post blast analysis I observed or was briefed on occurred due to enemy action. Every call that involved any type of incendiary damage was the result of a combination pe4, mortars or artillery rounds and diesel fuel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is news to me. I was all over Fallujah during that time I never saw anyone burnt by Willie Pete. I did however see South African 155s everywhere I saw Iraqi suicide bombers target their own countrymen(and women children) in fact any post blast analysis I observed or was briefed on occurred due to enemy action. Every call that involved any type of incendiary damage was the result of a combination pe4, mortars or artillery rounds and diesel fuel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by carl lowry</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56647</link>
		<dc:creator>carl lowry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56647</guid>
		<description>You must be an idiot. The attack on Japan was a retaliation against another government. The 9/11 terrorist attack was not from any sort of government but from a made up religion that requires the deaths of anyone that is not apart of said religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must be an idiot. The attack on Japan was a retaliation against another government. The 9/11 terrorist attack was not from any sort of government but from a made up religion that requires the deaths of anyone that is not apart of said religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hugh Hendry advocates abolishing fractional-reserve banking? by Christiaan</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/hugh-hendry-advocates-abolishing-fractional-reserve-banking/comment-page-1/#comment-56628</link>
		<dc:creator>Christiaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=968#comment-56628</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve uploaded H.264 version so hopefully you can view it now Conza. If not, I&#039;ll be uploading Ogg version this evening. Thanks for letting me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve uploaded H.264 version so hopefully you can view it now Conza. If not, I’ll be uploading Ogg version this evening. Thanks for letting me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hugh Hendry advocates abolishing fractional-reserve banking? by Conza88</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/hugh-hendry-advocates-abolishing-fractional-reserve-banking/comment-page-1/#comment-56627</link>
		<dc:creator>Conza88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=968#comment-56627</guid>
		<description>Hi. Is this available anywhere? Love to hear it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Is this available anywhere? Love to hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by Tsuneko Sakaguchi</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56624</link>
		<dc:creator>Tsuneko Sakaguchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56624</guid>
		<description>The droppings of  the atomic bomb to Japan by the US was also the mean of a scientific experiment as long as people in Japan today are understood. (The US would never have bombed a European country!) Indeed, the people in my country suffered great deals and has experienced the enormous power of the nuclear with their body and their land.. Yet again, after the war,the next generation was coesed to introduce nuclear energy plant by the US. even though the country&#039;s land is earthquake-prone and it is not fit for the use of nukes. The Japanese scientists and the engineers has also believed the &#039;peaceful&#039; use of nukes. And what happened in Fukushima and beyond since 11/3 this year? It&#039;s an unspeakable disaster.
Anyway,whoever the group of the race or nationality, as long as  they are in denial of the atrocity of their action they will continue to terrorise others to get their ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The droppings of  the atomic bomb to Japan by the US was also the mean of a scientific experiment as long as people in Japan today are understood. (The US would never have bombed a European country!) Indeed, the people in my country suffered great deals and has experienced the enormous power of the nuclear with their body and their land.. Yet again, after the war,the next generation was coesed to introduce nuclear energy plant by the US. even though the country’s land is earthquake-prone and it is not fit for the use of nukes. The Japanese scientists and the engineers has also believed the ‘peaceful’ use of nukes. And what happened in Fukushima and beyond since 11/3 this year? It’s an unspeakable disaster.<br />
Anyway,whoever the group of the race or nationality, as long as  they are in denial of the atrocity of their action they will continue to terrorise others to get their ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why we shouldn’t wear bicycle helmets by mike</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/why-we-shouldnt-wear-bicycle-helmets/comment-page-1/#comment-56622</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 05:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=4533#comment-56622</guid>
		<description>He made a strong argument, but he presented no evidence to back it up. He said that studies have shown that helmets don&#039;t protect us. What studies? How were they conducted? How rigorous were they and how many were there?

My I, like most people, I suspect, have always believed that helmets do help protect us, based purely on common sense. If this is not true, I would like to know why. Certainly I would prefer to ride without one if it doesn&#039;t do any good.

I am an avid cyclist who has unfortunately been in several accidents, though none involving cars or hitting my head. My brother had a bicycle accident (no car involved) and did hit his head. He suffered a serious concussion. But, if he had not been wearing a helmet, I strongly suspect that it might have killed him. Until I see some strong evidence and not just assertions, I&#039;ll keep wearing a helmet when I ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He made a strong argument, but he presented no evidence to back it up. He said that studies have shown that helmets don’t protect us. What studies? How were they conducted? How rigorous were they and how many were there?</p>
<p>My I, like most people, I suspect, have always believed that helmets do help protect us, based purely on common sense. If this is not true, I would like to know why. Certainly I would prefer to ride without one if it doesn’t do any good.</p>
<p>I am an avid cyclist who has unfortunately been in several accidents, though none involving cars or hitting my head. My brother had a bicycle accident (no car involved) and did hit his head. He suffered a serious concussion. But, if he had not been wearing a helmet, I strongly suspect that it might have killed him. Until I see some strong evidence and not just assertions, I’ll keep wearing a helmet when I ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by Mark</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56621</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56621</guid>
		<description>Most of the people who disagree state that their argument for killing innocent civiliansis that it saved hundres, thousands and millions.  Where they are getting this data from I have no idea.  There is no way to tell even if a single soul would have died.  No one sees the future.  The bottom line is it is never right under ANY circumstances to kill innocent people who are not signed up for war.  If you have not signed up as a soldier then you should not die at the hand of a soldier regardless of your colour of skin.  It is unwritten however there seems to be a underlying feeling that there is entitlement and that some nationalities are not as worthy of &quot;life&quot; as Americans.  We all enjoy the right to be on this blessed planet.  It was a horrible act that should never be repeated.  NO CIVILIANS SHOULD BE KILLED ANYWHERE ESPECIALLY WITH PURPOSE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the people who disagree state that their argument for killing innocent civiliansis that it saved hundres, thousands and millions.  Where they are getting this data from I have no idea.  There is no way to tell even if a single soul would have died.  No one sees the future.  The bottom line is it is never right under ANY circumstances to kill innocent people who are not signed up for war.  If you have not signed up as a soldier then you should not die at the hand of a soldier regardless of your colour of skin.  It is unwritten however there seems to be a underlying feeling that there is entitlement and that some nationalities are not as worthy of “life” as Americans.  We all enjoy the right to be on this blessed planet.  It was a horrible act that should never be repeated.  NO CIVILIANS SHOULD BE KILLED ANYWHERE ESPECIALLY WITH PURPOSE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Documentary: chemical weapons used on people in Iraq by DeWayne</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/documentary-phosphorus-and-firebombs-used-on-people-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-56619</link>
		<dc:creator>DeWayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/2005/11/documentary-phosphorus-and-firebombs-used-on-people-in-iraq/#comment-56619</guid>
		<description>White Phosphorous used on the city of Fallujah, Iraq (BBC report):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4440664.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White Phosphorous used on the city of Fallujah, Iraq (BBC report):<br />
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4440664.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4440664.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Documentary: chemical weapons used on people in Iraq by DeWayne</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/documentary-phosphorus-and-firebombs-used-on-people-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-56618</link>
		<dc:creator>DeWayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/2005/11/documentary-phosphorus-and-firebombs-used-on-people-in-iraq/#comment-56618</guid>
		<description>No doubt many have posted validated reports of the Pentagon finally admitting use of White Phosphorous on Fallujah, Iraq, and no doubt the Pentagon told the troops that the &quot;Crispy Critters&quot; found fried in armored vehicle&#039;s around Iraq were from rounds that penetrate armor and then explode.
Anyway here is BBC report for starters regarding this godles weapon used only because this nation &#039;set aside by god&#039; has not signed the treaty against this godless weapon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt many have posted validated reports of the Pentagon finally admitting use of White Phosphorous on Fallujah, Iraq, and no doubt the Pentagon told the troops that the “Crispy Critters” found fried in armored vehicle’s around Iraq were from rounds that penetrate armor and then explode.<br />
Anyway here is BBC report for starters regarding this godles weapon used only because this nation ‘set aside by god’ has not signed the treaty against this godless weapon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by Jean Smith</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56607</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 03:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56607</guid>
		<description>just for your information the japanesse had already surrender when the bombs were dropped, yes there was some independent kamikaze attacks but nothing the US couldn&#039;t control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just for your information the japanesse had already surrender when the bombs were dropped, yes there was some independent kamikaze attacks but nothing the US couldn’t control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by JustSomeGuy</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56606</link>
		<dc:creator>JustSomeGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56606</guid>
		<description>Also I must say,

Rufio, 
23 July, 2011 at 3:01 am 

is the best comment here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also I must say,</p>
<p>Rufio,<br />
23 July, 2011 at 3:01 am </p>
<p>is the best comment here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by JustSomeGuy</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56605</link>
		<dc:creator>JustSomeGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56605</guid>
		<description>I see the points of almost everyone on here and these facts dont mean I fully agree with either point of view since IMO there is no right or wrong here we cant look back now and play what ifs with such a huge point in history. 

But I have to say Japan had 500,000 to 1,000,000 civilian deaths, thats only inocent people.

America had 1700 civilian deaths and 417000 soilders die, that means more civilans died in Japan than American soilders and cilivans together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the points of almost everyone on here and these facts dont mean I fully agree with either point of view since IMO there is no right or wrong here we cant look back now and play what ifs with such a huge point in history. </p>
<p>But I have to say Japan had 500,000 to 1,000,000 civilian deaths, thats only inocent people.</p>
<p>America had 1700 civilian deaths and 417000 soilders die, that means more civilans died in Japan than American soilders and cilivans together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by Christiaan</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56604</link>
		<dc:creator>Christiaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56604</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know where this idea that acts of terror and acts of war are mutually exclusive comes from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t know where this idea that acts of terror and acts of war are mutually exclusive comes from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by Simon</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56603</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 04:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56603</guid>
		<description>The bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima were NOT an act of terror, but they were an act of war. If the bombs were not dropped there would have been more civillian casualties and a longer world war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima were NOT an act of terror, but they were an act of war. If the bombs were not dropped there would have been more civillian casualties and a longer world war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by Subhankar Das</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56602</link>
		<dc:creator>Subhankar Das</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56602</guid>
		<description>Japan may have been a proud race! By how does killing of Thousands on innocent people justify this act as a moral thing? On 9/11 when Al-queda attacked the Twin towers and pentagon killing 3000 people, people continued to say that innocent people were killed! So if the bombing on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were acts of morality, then I m sorry to say but 9/11 attacks were of morality too. 
I love America more than anything, but covering up its wrong doings is not the best way to highlight it! Bombing of Nagasaki n Hiroshima were certainly cold-blooded acts of terror! because the people who died were as innocents as our heroes who died on 9/11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japan may have been a proud race! By how does killing of Thousands on innocent people justify this act as a moral thing? On 9/11 when Al-queda attacked the Twin towers and pentagon killing 3000 people, people continued to say that innocent people were killed! So if the bombing on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were acts of morality, then I m sorry to say but 9/11 attacks were of morality too.<br />
I love America more than anything, but covering up its wrong doings is not the best way to highlight it! Bombing of Nagasaki n Hiroshima were certainly cold-blooded acts of terror! because the people who died were as innocents as our heroes who died on 9/11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jason Burke’s Bin Laden obituary perpetuates myth that Taliban refused to hand Bin Laden over by Nick McFarlane</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/jason-burkes-bin-laden-obituary-perpetuates-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-56601</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick McFarlane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=4595#comment-56601</guid>
		<description>Can someone please tell me why Bin Laden, sitting happily in his compound with access to a video camera and couriers to the outside world, decided not to send out any videos taunting the West or rousing up his own people? Are we to believe that for all those years, he sat idle, with his greatest weapon – the ability to incite terror and fear through video releases – yet decided not to so? I just don&#039;t get that strategy. Anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone please tell me why Bin Laden, sitting happily in his compound with access to a video camera and couriers to the outside world, decided not to send out any videos taunting the West or rousing up his own people? Are we to believe that for all those years, he sat idle, with his greatest weapon – the ability to incite terror and fear through video releases – yet decided not to so? I just don’t get that strategy. Anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by Fredrik</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56600</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 17:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56600</guid>
		<description>These bombs are the worst act of TERRORISM the world have ever seen, thats a fact. And its horrible to see that the US is invading counttries all the time to look for weapons of mass destruction, when in fact its USA alone who have been coldblooded and dumb enough to ever have used these bombs on foreign soil, The world should invade USA and remove there atom bombs!! And Im sure that will happen soon because USA is the most hated country in the world today, hated by all other countries, thats also a fact. You morons are digging your own graves, If I was you I would stop terrorising all other countries and start fixing stuff back home, like medical care, because you got one of the worst medical care systems in the world as well! American bastards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These bombs are the worst act of TERRORISM the world have ever seen, thats a fact. And its horrible to see that the US is invading counttries all the time to look for weapons of mass destruction, when in fact its USA alone who have been coldblooded and dumb enough to ever have used these bombs on foreign soil, The world should invade USA and remove there atom bombs!! And Im sure that will happen soon because USA is the most hated country in the world today, hated by all other countries, thats also a fact. You morons are digging your own graves, If I was you I would stop terrorising all other countries and start fixing stuff back home, like medical care, because you got one of the worst medical care systems in the world as well! American bastards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why so many things are badly designed by Scoox</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/why-so-many-things-are-badly-designed/comment-page-1/#comment-56599</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2014#comment-56599</guid>
		<description>Well, Apple products look pretty, but that doesn&#039;t make them a good design. I think many of Apple products have rather inconvenient designes:
- Mouse - You cannot lift it off the table and continue holding down the mouse buttons.
- Generally speaking, too few buttons which trades usability for looks
- No hardware eject optical media button
- No delete key on their keyboards
- Apple portable players require users to use iTunes rather than allowing users to simply drag and drop files onto the portable player. iTune is the reason why I don&#039;t own any Apple portable media players, by the way.
- Their OS also has a lot of annoying features, e.g. mouse acceleration, menu bar is tied to one monitor, window resizing can only be done from one corner... the list goes on.

So yeah, Apple some times has good ideas and some times they should pull their own head out of their a**.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Apple products look pretty, but that doesn’t make them a good design. I think many of Apple products have rather inconvenient designes:<br />
– Mouse — You cannot lift it off the table and continue holding down the mouse buttons.<br />
– Generally speaking, too few buttons which trades usability for looks<br />
– No hardware eject optical media button<br />
– No delete key on their keyboards<br />
– Apple portable players require users to use iTunes rather than allowing users to simply drag and drop files onto the portable player. iTune is the reason why I don’t own any Apple portable media players, by the way.<br />
– Their OS also has a lot of annoying features, e.g. mouse acceleration, menu bar is tied to one monitor, window resizing can only be done from one corner… the list goes on.</p>
<p>So yeah, Apple some times has good ideas and some times they should pull their own head out of their a**.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by Don</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56598</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56598</guid>
		<description>What are you smoking, crack?  The atom bombs were part of World War II, and ended the war.  I guess you think the Bombing of Pearl Harbor was an air show by a friendly country.
Somebody please overwrite this nosepicker&#039;s drivel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you smoking, crack?  The atom bombs were part of World War II, and ended the war.  I guess you think the Bombing of Pearl Harbor was an air show by a friendly country.<br />
Somebody please overwrite this nosepicker’s drivel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by Rufio</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56597</link>
		<dc:creator>Rufio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 02:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56597</guid>
		<description>Everyone has very strong points here. War, terrorism, justifiable, unjustified. . . but at the end of the day it&#039;s war. It&#039;s not going to be anything else but horrific and terrible for all sides. To expect decency and civility when you have so many people literally fighting for their lives by murdering others is unreasonable. War is beyond the logic we are trying to apply to the situation here. Attacking Hiroshima and Nagasaki with weapons of mass destruction was especially atrocious. Granted, they were military citizens, but lots of civilians did die. It could have been Tokyo, but it wasn&#039;t. That doesn&#039;t mean the attack was the right solution. I think once you&#039;re beyond diplomacy, there is no &#039;right&#039; solution. It was a solution and I think at that point in time, that was most important. We have the benefit of decades of research and Apocalyptic close-calls and frankly better weapons to judge the choices harshly, but at the time, what would you have done?

Let&#039;s not forget that by this time, the war in europe was over. The soviets made tremendous sacrifices for which Europe, and America and Canada or indebted. Yes, the Soviets helped the Americans in one sense, the Americans helped the soviets in other senses. We were all allies, we helped each other. Even so, both soviet and american scientists were using the germans&#039; research to build atomic weapons. 

The soviets were committed to spreading communism and expanding their empire even during the reconstruction of europe--ie east germany, berlin wall, satellite states, etc. Many people agree that the destruction of Hiroshima and especially Nagasaki was more of a show of force to the Soviets than to the Japanese. The war was essentially over. Japan was more or less defeated by Aug. 8 1945. It was the United States way of proving to the only other state in the world powerful enough to rival itself that it had nuclear weapons and wasn&#039;t afraid to use them. 

If the Russians had bombed Japan (their enemy and neighbor) before the US, perhaps the world would not be undergoing enforced &#039;democratization&#039;. Who knows. The point is, war sucks. Once international relationships break down past the point of non-violent resolutions, you&#039;re ALWAYS going to get one atrocity or another. Rather than try to decide who was more wrong, or whether it was an act of terror or act of war (two cities got nuked--what&#039;s in a name?), we should practice peaceable resolutions to disagreements, even on the internet. 
Be the change you want to see in the world -Ghandi

(PS I&#039;m an educated American. I&#039;m tired of the world calling all americans stupid americans. and i&#039;m tired of stupid americans giving them a reason to call us names.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone has very strong points here. War, terrorism, justifiable, unjustified… but at the end of the day it’s war. It’s not going to be anything else but horrific and terrible for all sides. To expect decency and civility when you have so many people literally fighting for their lives by murdering others is unreasonable. War is beyond the logic we are trying to apply to the situation here. Attacking Hiroshima and Nagasaki with weapons of mass destruction was especially atrocious. Granted, they were military citizens, but lots of civilians did die. It could have been Tokyo, but it wasn’t. That doesn’t mean the attack was the right solution. I think once you’re beyond diplomacy, there is no ‘right’ solution. It was a solution and I think at that point in time, that was most important. We have the benefit of decades of research and Apocalyptic close-calls and frankly better weapons to judge the choices harshly, but at the time, what would you have done?</p>
<p>Let’s not forget that by this time, the war in europe was over. The soviets made tremendous sacrifices for which Europe, and America and Canada or indebted. Yes, the Soviets helped the Americans in one sense, the Americans helped the soviets in other senses. We were all allies, we helped each other. Even so, both soviet and american scientists were using the germans’ research to build atomic weapons. </p>
<p>The soviets were committed to spreading communism and expanding their empire even during the reconstruction of europe–ie east germany, berlin wall, satellite states, etc. Many people agree that the destruction of Hiroshima and especially Nagasaki was more of a show of force to the Soviets than to the Japanese. The war was essentially over. Japan was more or less defeated by Aug. 8 1945. It was the United States way of proving to the only other state in the world powerful enough to rival itself that it had nuclear weapons and wasn’t afraid to use them. </p>
<p>If the Russians had bombed Japan (their enemy and neighbor) before the US, perhaps the world would not be undergoing enforced ‘democratization’. Who knows. The point is, war sucks. Once international relationships break down past the point of non-violent resolutions, you’re ALWAYS going to get one atrocity or another. Rather than try to decide who was more wrong, or whether it was an act of terror or act of war (two cities got nuked–what’s in a name?), we should practice peaceable resolutions to disagreements, even on the internet.<br />
Be the change you want to see in the world –Ghandi</p>
<p>(PS I’m an educated American. I’m tired of the world calling all americans stupid americans. and i’m tired of stupid americans giving them a reason to call us names.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The science of why we don’t believe science by Laroussi Abdelhakim</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-science-of-why-we-dont-believe-science/comment-page-1/#comment-56596</link>
		<dc:creator>Laroussi Abdelhakim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=4581#comment-56596</guid>
		<description>I think one has to look at it from  a sociological point of view as well, we are sociological beings and thus are under influence of the group we&#039;re in. Presenting a new vision wether with or without proof has always been hazardous. Questions about the structure of the group or how the group has to put itself into conformation ( adaptation) will always arise. Also I think because people want to be part of a group without being remembered that they do so, (quest for confirmation of the individual thought) therefore some idea&#039;s will be casted out. 
Also, we have a general idea about scientist an science (labs, rats, flashing led-lights) that make us wonder: &quot;how could such an unkown, abnormal envirenment create &#039;knowledge&#039; usable in &quot;&quot;my&quot;&quot; everyday life? You need a clear example: the toothbrush publicity. Never had there been anything else to be judged by so many critics on TV, that is to say out loud. ( At least where my TV is, taking in consideration that it&#039;s on TV). Also we might just be bad losers who won&#039;t give in, after all a scientist is only human, thus leads us to the pad of thinking &quot;if I came up as first&quot; . Let alone science and it&#039;s funding.
Our feeling towards science is one of hidden jeaulousy or envy. If it&#039;s sooths us we become pseudo-scientists if it doesn&#039;t we become critics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one has to look at it from  a sociological point of view as well, we are sociological beings and thus are under influence of the group we’re in. Presenting a new vision wether with or without proof has always been hazardous. Questions about the structure of the group or how the group has to put itself into conformation ( adaptation) will always arise. Also I think because people want to be part of a group without being remembered that they do so, (quest for confirmation of the individual thought) therefore some idea’s will be casted out.<br />
Also, we have a general idea about scientist an science (labs, rats, flashing led-lights) that make us wonder: “how could such an unkown, abnormal envirenment create ‘knowledge’ usable in ““my”” everyday life? You need a clear example: the toothbrush publicity. Never had there been anything else to be judged by so many critics on TV, that is to say out loud. ( At least where my TV is, taking in consideration that it’s on TV). Also we might just be bad losers who won’t give in, after all a scientist is only human, thus leads us to the pad of thinking “if I came up as first” . Let alone science and it’s funding.<br />
Our feeling towards science is one of hidden jeaulousy or envy. If it’s sooths us we become pseudo-scientists if it doesn’t we become critics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by Fiona</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56573</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56573</guid>
		<description>War is NOT terrorism. Lets get that out of the way now.

What Japan did to Pearl Harbor and several other countries was unacceptable. And its disgusting of the Americans to drop bombs on INNOCENTS. 
Japan&#039;s reasons for the attacks on Pearl Harbor were totally unnecessary. Telling Americans to back off from their buisiness by attacking Pearl Harbor is also unforgiven. It was the Japanese who initiated the battle, so its their fault for starting it all, but the Americans disgraced themselves with what they did. Around 120,000 civillians died in the Japanese cities. Not something to be proud of, keep in mind.
And DON&#039;T tell me that Americans stopped World War II. It shouldn&#039;t have had to be the hard way.
Of course, the general Japanese will say that Americans are at fault, and the general Americans will say that the Japanese are. 
I&#039;m saying that both countries are faulty. America for their final acts, and Japan for their initiative.

I am neither Japanese or American, and this is what I think of the issue.

And, @Scott, you disgust me. Like everyone else here, its the deceased Russians who we thank, so get that in your thick, arrogant skull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>War is NOT terrorism. Lets get that out of the way now.</p>
<p>What Japan did to Pearl Harbor and several other countries was unacceptable. And its disgusting of the Americans to drop bombs on INNOCENTS.<br />
Japan’s reasons for the attacks on Pearl Harbor were totally unnecessary. Telling Americans to back off from their buisiness by attacking Pearl Harbor is also unforgiven. It was the Japanese who initiated the battle, so its their fault for starting it all, but the Americans disgraced themselves with what they did. Around 120,000 civillians died in the Japanese cities. Not something to be proud of, keep in mind.<br />
And DON’T tell me that Americans stopped World War II. It shouldn’t have had to be the hard way.<br />
Of course, the general Japanese will say that Americans are at fault, and the general Americans will say that the Japanese are.<br />
I’m saying that both countries are faulty. America for their final acts, and Japan for their initiative.</p>
<p>I am neither Japanese or American, and this is what I think of the issue.</p>
<p>And, @Scott, you disgust me. Like everyone else here, its the deceased Russians who we thank, so get that in your thick, arrogant skull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by Thantophobia</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56572</link>
		<dc:creator>Thantophobia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56572</guid>
		<description>In war, there are no rules.  This is what happens when opposing countries get together and compete.  &quot;Justified&quot; and &quot;unjustified&quot; are just words.  In war, everything is possible.  I think that probably the U.S., with its argument that they were trying to save lives, was just trying to justify them not having American casualties, but that doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that it wasn&#039;t justified.  Who&#039;s to say that civilians&#039; lives have more worth than soldiers?  Or that Japanese lives have more worth than Americans?  Or the other way around?  Whether anyone actually saved lives is not completely knowable.  It&#039;s all very debatable.

Decades following the bombing, the Soviet Union and America competed in the Cold War.  America did everything they possibly could to prevent a nuclear war.  In my opinion, things are improving, if slightly.  Nobody wants a nuclear war.  The pressure is increasing to get rid of nuclear weapons.  Will we succeed?  It&#039;s hard to tell.  Maybe, maybe not.  But for now, at least we&#039;re all trying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In war, there are no rules.  This is what happens when opposing countries get together and compete.  “Justified” and “unjustified” are just words.  In war, everything is possible.  I think that probably the U.S., with its argument that they were trying to save lives, was just trying to justify them not having American casualties, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that it wasn’t justified.  Who’s to say that civilians’ lives have more worth than soldiers?  Or that Japanese lives have more worth than Americans?  Or the other way around?  Whether anyone actually saved lives is not completely knowable.  It’s all very debatable.</p>
<p>Decades following the bombing, the Soviet Union and America competed in the Cold War.  America did everything they possibly could to prevent a nuclear war.  In my opinion, things are improving, if slightly.  Nobody wants a nuclear war.  The pressure is increasing to get rid of nuclear weapons.  Will we succeed?  It’s hard to tell.  Maybe, maybe not.  But for now, at least we’re all trying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by Dustin</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56570</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 04:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56570</guid>
		<description>Also, about how this would be a terrorist attack if not committed by the United States, I do not understand.  If another country did this to Japan now, it would be a terrorist attack.  If America bombed Japan now, it would be a terrorist attack.  Why?  Japan is a peaceful democracy.  In World War Two, the bomb was a last minute decision, meant to save lives.  If we had intended to drop the bomb for no reason other than to kill civilians, it would be a terrorist attack.  If Japan had dropped a bomb on us in WW2, it wouldn&#039;t have been a terrorist attack because it was an act of war.  Terrorism is when a certain group kills innocents for unprovoked, unnecessary reasons.  Even so, the term is incorrect.  A country cannot commit &quot;terrorism&quot; because terrorists cannot be a formed government.  This would be called GENOCIDE.  There is a difference.  The nuclear bombs may have been genocide, but hearing this and forming a negative opinion is unreasonable.  There is JUSTIFIED genocide, and there is UNJUSTIFIED genocide.
Pearl Harbor: unprovoked, killed thousands.
Atomic Bombs: provoked, killed tens of thousands, Japan had been warned (and we were already at war)
Invasion of Poland: unprovoked, a radio station had been bombed by the Germans (it was staged to make it look like the Polish had done it).  They then invaded the country for no reason other than misguided nationalism.

Further more, the United States Armed Forces receives little or no credit for the steps it takes to minimize civilian casualties.  People complain that the U.S. kills to many civilians.  The military has spent billions of dollars on making military technology safer to use so that civilians aren&#039;t killed.  Then the same people complain about the military overspending.  When asked, they say they are pro-military.  Ha.

This is the difference between justified and unjustified terrorism and genocide, and I want to make my point clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, about how this would be a terrorist attack if not committed by the United States, I do not understand.  If another country did this to Japan now, it would be a terrorist attack.  If America bombed Japan now, it would be a terrorist attack.  Why?  Japan is a peaceful democracy.  In World War Two, the bomb was a last minute decision, meant to save lives.  If we had intended to drop the bomb for no reason other than to kill civilians, it would be a terrorist attack.  If Japan had dropped a bomb on us in WW2, it wouldn’t have been a terrorist attack because it was an act of war.  Terrorism is when a certain group kills innocents for unprovoked, unnecessary reasons.  Even so, the term is incorrect.  A country cannot commit “terrorism” because terrorists cannot be a formed government.  This would be called GENOCIDE.  There is a difference.  The nuclear bombs may have been genocide, but hearing this and forming a negative opinion is unreasonable.  There is JUSTIFIED genocide, and there is UNJUSTIFIED genocide.<br />
Pearl Harbor: unprovoked, killed thousands.<br />
Atomic Bombs: provoked, killed tens of thousands, Japan had been warned (and we were already at war)<br />
Invasion of Poland: unprovoked, a radio station had been bombed by the Germans (it was staged to make it look like the Polish had done it).  They then invaded the country for no reason other than misguided nationalism.</p>
<p>Further more, the United States Armed Forces receives little or no credit for the steps it takes to minimize civilian casualties.  People complain that the U.S. kills to many civilians.  The military has spent billions of dollars on making military technology safer to use so that civilians aren’t killed.  Then the same people complain about the military overspending.  When asked, they say they are pro-military.  Ha.</p>
<p>This is the difference between justified and unjustified terrorism and genocide, and I want to make my point clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by Dustin</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56569</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 04:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56569</guid>
		<description>Look, the truth is that it is all war.  The bombs saved many more lives than they did kill.  In the late 1945&#039;s the U.S. was close to finishing Japan.  We knew we would have to invade Japan.  An invasion would mean thousands and millions of deaths on both sides.  With the invention of the atomic bomb, the U.S. had the chance to end the war quickly and efficiently.  We dropped two bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  Suddenly, just because it was one big bomb, it seems atrocious.  See, things like these happened daily.  The Germans, Americans, and Japanese alike flew over cities and bombed them to smithereens.  These bombings killed nearly twice as many people.  After the bombs, Japan surrendered, allowing democracy for itself and peace for the world.  Had the bombs not been dropped and the Japanese consequently not surrendered, we would have invaded, resulting in thousands of deaths and a longer war.  Also, we did not start World War 2.  We wanted neutrality.  Peace.  The Japanese were aggressors toward the Asian countries (China, Vietnam, Korea) and were sick and brutal with how they dealt with prisoners and civilians.  We extended our arm in peace, and they falsely accepted it, scheming behind our backs about bombing the home of the majority of the Pacific fleet: Pearl Harbor.  Thousands of Americans dead because of an unprovoked  attack by the Japanese empire.  In many textbooks, it proceeds Japan as a victim of the war.  This view is equivalent of a bully mauling a boy for his money.  The boy, knowing martial arts, defends himself, knocking out and wounding the bully.  The bully awakens and files a complaint to the police for assault.  The boy is then arrested and put in jail.  Justice?  Hardly.  Before someone begins treating an act of war as something atrocious just because we use ONE bomb, and not hundreds of littler ones, like BOTH sides did, i suggest they do some research on just how malicious we were compared to the Axis Powers.  Had we not dropped the bombs, millions of justified American soldiers would have been killed, and you&#039;re saying this is how it should have been?  I do not understand.  This is my viewpoint, and God Bless America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, the truth is that it is all war.  The bombs saved many more lives than they did kill.  In the late 1945’s the U.S. was close to finishing Japan.  We knew we would have to invade Japan.  An invasion would mean thousands and millions of deaths on both sides.  With the invention of the atomic bomb, the U.S. had the chance to end the war quickly and efficiently.  We dropped two bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  Suddenly, just because it was one big bomb, it seems atrocious.  See, things like these happened daily.  The Germans, Americans, and Japanese alike flew over cities and bombed them to smithereens.  These bombings killed nearly twice as many people.  After the bombs, Japan surrendered, allowing democracy for itself and peace for the world.  Had the bombs not been dropped and the Japanese consequently not surrendered, we would have invaded, resulting in thousands of deaths and a longer war.  Also, we did not start World War 2.  We wanted neutrality.  Peace.  The Japanese were aggressors toward the Asian countries (China, Vietnam, Korea) and were sick and brutal with how they dealt with prisoners and civilians.  We extended our arm in peace, and they falsely accepted it, scheming behind our backs about bombing the home of the majority of the Pacific fleet: Pearl Harbor.  Thousands of Americans dead because of an unprovoked  attack by the Japanese empire.  In many textbooks, it proceeds Japan as a victim of the war.  This view is equivalent of a bully mauling a boy for his money.  The boy, knowing martial arts, defends himself, knocking out and wounding the bully.  The bully awakens and files a complaint to the police for assault.  The boy is then arrested and put in jail.  Justice?  Hardly.  Before someone begins treating an act of war as something atrocious just because we use ONE bomb, and not hundreds of littler ones, like BOTH sides did, i suggest they do some research on just how malicious we were compared to the Axis Powers.  Had we not dropped the bombs, millions of justified American soldiers would have been killed, and you’re saying this is how it should have been?  I do not understand.  This is my viewpoint, and God Bless America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hero: Mike Prysner by Michael Talbot</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/hero-mike-prysner/comment-page-1/#comment-56565</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Talbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 21:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=4138#comment-56565</guid>
		<description>All my life I have supported our government, our troops and our security services.

All my life I have believed that our government was good and everything else was bad.

All my life I have been willing to defend our country, to attack those who threaten us and to expose those who plot and plan against us.

It was a terrible, devastating revelation, to realise that it is our own governments who threaten us, it is the elite and privileged who plot and plan against ordinary, hard-working people like me.  I can remember feeling very emotional, then incredibly angry to learn that 911 was not as portrayed by those who are meant to protect us.

Heroes like Mike Prysner are unbelievably brave and honourable and I thank him for his courage.  It is only when people like this brave soldier stand up and speak the truth, that things have a hope of changing.

I do what I can in my own way but I am totally blown away by Mike Prysner and his willingness to tell the world just exactly how it is.  

Sir, you have my total admiration and love, I am so proud of you.

Michael Talbot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All my life I have supported our government, our troops and our security services.</p>
<p>All my life I have believed that our government was good and everything else was bad.</p>
<p>All my life I have been willing to defend our country, to attack those who threaten us and to expose those who plot and plan against us.</p>
<p>It was a terrible, devastating revelation, to realise that it is our own governments who threaten us, it is the elite and privileged who plot and plan against ordinary, hard-working people like me.  I can remember feeling very emotional, then incredibly angry to learn that 911 was not as portrayed by those who are meant to protect us.</p>
<p>Heroes like Mike Prysner are unbelievably brave and honourable and I thank him for his courage.  It is only when people like this brave soldier stand up and speak the truth, that things have a hope of changing.</p>
<p>I do what I can in my own way but I am totally blown away by Mike Prysner and his willingness to tell the world just exactly how it is.  </p>
<p>Sir, you have my total admiration and love, I am so proud of you.</p>
<p>Michael Talbot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by bigboy</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56564</link>
		<dc:creator>bigboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 02:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56564</guid>
		<description>Ok you don&#039;t know what your talking about... if we wouldn&#039;t have dropped the bombs on hiroshima and Nagasaki we would have lost thousand of more u.s. troops. We had already seen what the Japs were capable of doing at pearl harbor. Why would you want to lose more american life? Your some american have some pride in your country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok you don’t know what your talking about… if we wouldn’t have dropped the bombs on hiroshima and Nagasaki we would have lost thousand of more u.s. troops. We had already seen what the Japs were capable of doing at pearl harbor. Why would you want to lose more american life? Your some american have some pride in your country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The worst terrorist attack in history by Jonnie Boy</title>
		<link>http://last-straw.net/the-worst-terrorist-attack-in-history/comment-page-1/#comment-56562</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonnie Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 09:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://last-straw.net/?p=2278#comment-56562</guid>
		<description>@ Scott: &quot;Are you European? If so, you owe a tre­mend­ous debt to the United States of Amer­ica. For what? For sav­ing the lives of your ancest­ors!&quot;
Your words are revolting and disgusting ... I am a European and owe the USA nothing. 
Presumably, in your ignorance and arrogance you aren&#039;t bothered who you insult, nor do you respect the millions upon millions of non US Americans whom I actually DO owe a debt?
The ridiculous conversion of criticism = hate when discussing anything even remotely critical of the USA is actually cringeworthy. I encounter it a lot and it never fooled me, it doesn&#039;t, fortunately, convince ALL of your countryfolk either.
Your &quot;A ter­ror­ist delights in the death of their foes&quot; is so shallow I can&#039;t even paddle in it ... tell ... how do you know that? (or is it a propagandist ranting?)
Methinks, when it comes to hate, you yourself are either a pot or a kettle at best.
Attempts at retrospectively embedding a new &quot;American&quot; definition of terrorism in the mind of the world wont work. It&#039;s not a particularly old term, not quite as old as the USA as it happens, but it means what it means and the nuclear attacks on Japan are described to perfection by it.

Scott ... I hope you went and learned this between your rant and now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Scott: “Are you European? If so, you owe a tre­mend­ous debt to the United States of Amer­ica. For what? For sav­ing the lives of your ancest­ors!“<br />
Your words are revolting and disgusting … I am a European and owe the USA nothing.<br />
Presumably, in your ignorance and arrogance you aren’t bothered who you insult, nor do you respect the millions upon millions of non US Americans whom I actually DO owe a debt?<br />
The ridiculous conversion of criticism = hate when discussing anything even remotely critical of the USA is actually cringeworthy. I encounter it a lot and it never fooled me, it doesn’t, fortunately, convince ALL of your countryfolk either.<br />
Your “A ter­ror­ist delights in the death of their foes” is so shallow I can’t even paddle in it … tell … how do you know that? (or is it a propagandist ranting?)<br />
Methinks, when it comes to hate, you yourself are either a pot or a kettle at best.<br />
Attempts at retrospectively embedding a new “American” definition of terrorism in the mind of the world wont work. It’s not a particularly old term, not quite as old as the USA as it happens, but it means what it means and the nuclear attacks on Japan are described to perfection by it.</p>
<p>Scott … I hope you went and learned this between your rant and now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

