Tag War crimes

Blair loses, audible sigh of relief heard around world

For those of you sub­jec­ted to the unfor­tu­nate idea of hav­ing Tony Blair as first pres­id­ent of the EU you’ll pleased to know the war crim­inal never came close.

No Right Turn:

The European Union has its first per­man­ent coun­cil pres­id­ent — and its not Tony Blair. Instead, EU lead­ers have chosen Bel­gian Prime Min­is­ter Her­man van Rompuy for the top job. His chief vir­tues? He’s from a small state actu­ally com­mit­ted to the European pro­ject (unlike the UK), and he’s a con­sensus politi­cian, rather than a divis­ive auto­crat (unlike Blair). Plus of course he’s not a war crim­inal — always a bonus when you’re try­ing to run a state com­mit­ted to peace and inter­na­tional law.

Jacqui Janes is wrong about why her son is dead

Jac­qui Janes believes her son is dead because the war in Afgh­anistan is under-resourced.

He’s not. He’s dead because he was fight­ing an unjust war.

The stated aim of the inva­sion of Afgh­anistan was to find Osama bin Laden and other high-ranking Al-Qaeda mem­bers. On 14 Octo­ber, 2001, the Taliban pub­licly offered to hand over Osama bin Laden to a third coun­try, provided the U.S. hal­ted the illegal bomb­ing of Afgh­anistan and pro­duced the neces­sary evid­ence about involve­ment of bin Laden or any of his asso­ci­ates in the 11 Septem­ber attacks.

George Bush junior dis­missed this offer and con­tin­ued with the offens­ive, put­ting an end to any pos­sib­il­ity of a poten­tially peace­ful, legal res­ol­u­tion to the events of 11 Septem­ber 2001.

The United Nations Secur­ity Coun­cil never author­ised the inva­sion of Afgh­anistan and it cer­tainly wasn’t an act of self-defence. It was an act of aggres­sion, the supreme inter­na­tional crime.

Neither George Bush nor Gor­don Brown had to go off to war, but Jac­qui Janes’ son did, and now he’s dead.

We invaded Iraq and all we get is this lousy t-shirt’

They invade and lay waste another coun­try, des­troy the lives of mil­lions of Iraqis for gen­er­a­tions to come, all on some trumped up drivel about “weapons of mass destruction.”

Now they’re arguing over the real reason. Oil. It’s not enough that con­trol of Iraq’s crude is being div­vied up amongst the cap­it­al­ists of the world. Thomas Pick­ens — an oil tycoon and polit­ical act­iv­ist who hasn’t served a day in the army him­self — has been arguing a line, and accord­ing to Reu­ters, recently told U.S. con­gress that he thinks U.S. cap­it­al­ists alone are “entitled” to Iraqi crude because “we” spent bil­lions of U.S. taxes and the lives of 5000 U.S. army pawns invad­ing and occupy­ing the country.

Classy.

NZ National/ACT government wants option to commit war crimes

No Right Turn on the NZ National/ACT government’s oppos­i­tion to a new bill that would make it a national crim­inal offence for any New Zea­l­and polit­ical leader to “plan, pre­pare, ini­ti­ate or execute an act of aggres­sion” in viol­a­tion of the UN Charter.

… when Wayne Mapp says he doesn’t want our for­eign policy to be sub­ject to a UN veto, what he is really say­ing is that he wants to wage war in con­tra­ven­tion of inter­na­tional law and the UN charter — in other words, he wants us to be a rogue nation, just like the US

Which seems to me to be a per­fect example of why we must pass the bill.

Cheney: an evil person for evil times

The Guard­ian: ‘Mem­oirs to reveal Dick Cheney thought Bush had gone soft on war on terror.’

Who knows what dark place we’d all be in if this man had become U.S. President.

Colonel Julian didn’t get the memo

Ahh, yes, there’s noth­ing like a little Amer­ican excep­tion­al­ism to get one going in the morning.

Accord­ing to Reu­ters, Col­onel Greg Julian, a U.S. mil­it­ary spokes­man in Kabul, has been com­plain­ing that the Taliban is viol­at­ing inter­na­tional law by parad­ing a cap­tured U.S. sol­dier on camera.

It seems Col­onel Julian didn’t get the memo: the U.S. tore up inter­na­tional law a long time ago.

Not only did the U.S. com­mit the supreme war crime when it invaded Afgh­anistan and Iraq — supreme because of all that ensues from start­ing a war, includ­ing the crimes of your oppon­ents — but this is the same coun­try, of course, to have declared by pres­id­en­tial order that the Geneva Con­ven­tions did not apply to cap­tured Taliban sol­diers and has since been detain­ing Afghan pris­on­ers without trial, sneak­ing them off to Guantanamo and its secret pris­ons and tor­tur­ing them.

You’ve gotta be kidding me…

Blair in frame to become first EU pres­id­ent, says Glenys Kin­nock.”

A war crim­inal as pres­id­ent of Europe? I think the accom­pa­ny­ing com­ments tell the real story.

Blair’s scared he’ll end up in the dock for war crimes

Looks like Blair is run­ning scared he’ll end up in the dock for war crimes. Not sur­pris­ing con­sid­er­ing the lengths he went to to help bring about the war of aggres­sion against Iraq.

Free Ezra Nawi

Sign and send a mesage: freeezra.org

Join Naomi Klein, Neve Gor­don, Noam Chom­sky and thou­sands of oth­ers and tell Israel not to jail Ezra Nawi, one of Israel’s most cour­ageous human rights activists.

His crime? He tried to stop a mil­it­ary bull­dozer from des­troy­ing the homes of Palestinian Bedouins in the South Hebron region.

Nawi, a Jew­ish Israeli of Iraqi des­cent, is a threat to the set­tlers and the Israeli gov­ern­ment because he has brought inter­na­tional atten­tion to efforts to illeg­ally remove Palestini­ans from the Hebron region. He will be sen­tenced in July.

Watch these young Israeli sol­diers demol­ish the home, arrest Nawi and then laugh about the deprav­ity. Truly lost in the darkness.

Another whitewash hardly surprising

If Gor­don Brown were to open the way for a truly inde­pend­ent and open inquiry into the inva­sion and occu­pa­tion of Iraq he would quite likely find him­self in the dock for war crimes.