Category Science

Five essential things to know about evolution

John Tim­mer writ­ing for Ars Tech­nica:

If sci­ent­ists had to pick one area of sci­ence that’s most fre­quently mis­un­der­stood, evol­u­tion would prob­ably win the vote. It’s not simply the sea of mis­in­form­a­tion avail­able on the Inter­net (although that clearly doesn’t help); it also seems that a lot of people who accept the sci­entific evid­ence don’t fully appre­ci­ate some aspects of evol­u­tion­ary the­ory. It’s one thing to remem­ber a few examples of the com­pel­ling evid­ence we have for evol­u­tion; it’s another thing entirely to appre­ci­ate the fea­tures of the pro­cess that make it so incred­ibly power­ful but, at the same time, hide many of its actions from our com­mon experience.

Climate Camp’s open letter to the Met

Open let­ter from the Camp for Cli­mate Action to Ian Thomas, the Chief Super­in­tend­ent of the Met­ro­pol­itan Police Ser­vice. Worth read­ing in it’s entirety.

The giant Apollo 11 post

Kottke’s giant Apollo 11 post. I’ve spent the last couple of hours or so read­ing it and check­ing out all the great links.

(via Dar­ing Fire­ball)

Capitalist democracy in action: the fossil fuelled campaign for global warming

Here they are, hav­ing weaselled them­selves into a pos­i­tion to dig up hugely valu­able resources from under our feet for a steal, only to flog them off to be burnt and dan­ger­ously pol­lute our only atmo­sphere. When we real­ise how dan­ger­ous it is, they use these stolen pro­ceeds to block any attempt to mend the dam­age by launch­ing a pro­pa­ganda cam­paign and buy­ing off politicians:

Obama’s key cli­mate bill hit by $45m PR cam­paign.

And people call this demo­cracy? These people are the highest of crim­in­als. For­get the war on ter­ror, what we should have is a war on fossil fuel pushers.

The Reason Project launches

The Reason Pro­ject, co-founded by Sam Har­ris, launched today:

The Reason Pro­ject is a non­profit found­a­tion devoted to spread­ing sci­entific know­ledge and sec­u­lar val­ues in soci­ety. The found­a­tion draws on the tal­ents of prom­in­ent and cre­at­ive thinkers in a wide range of dis­cip­lines to encour­age crit­ical think­ing and erode the influ­ence of dog­mat­ism, super­sti­tion, and bigotry in our world.

U.S. finally comes in from the cold

U.S. finally comes in from the cold, so to speak:

Clin­ton addressed the com­plaints of devel­op­ing coun­tries such as India and China that Amer­ica and the EU, by demand­ing bind­ing emis­sions cuts, want to saddle them with the bur­den of cli­mate change; they argue they did not cause the prob­lem and must pri­or­it­ise growth. She said the US recog­nised indus­tri­al­ised coun­tries bore a respons­ib­il­ity: “Some coun­tries like mine are respons­ible for past emis­sions.” She wanted China and India to grow their eco­nom­ies: “We want people to have a higher stand­ard of living.”

Obama had broken with eight years of denial under George Bush, Clin­ton said. “The United States is fully engaged and ready to lead and determ­ined to make up for lost time both at home and abroad … the US is no longer absent without leave.”

Bet­ter late than never.

Open mindedness

via one­good­move.

Detox quackery

Prince Charles detox ‘quack­ery’, BBC

Noth­ing would, of course, be easier than to demon­strate that detox products work. All one needed to do is to take a few blood samples from volun­teers and test whether this or that toxin is elim­in­ated from the body faster than nor­mal,” [Pro­fessor Ernst] said.

But where are the stud­ies that demon­strate effic­acy? They do not exist, and the reason is simple: these products have no real detox­i­fic­a­tion effects.”

Earlier this year the char­it­able trust Sense About Sci­ence pro­duced a report seek­ing to debunk claims made about detox products.
Its research­ers reviewed a series of products, from bottled water to face scrub, and found the detox asser­tions to be over­whelm­ingly meaningless.

It seems out­rageous for com­pan­ies to be mak­ing money selling mean­ing­less products but for the heir to the throne to be doing so, at £10 a pop, is even more inap­pro­pri­ate,” said Tom Wells, who helped carry out the ori­ginal research.

We must break link between green issues and altern­at­ive medi­cine, The Guard­ian, George Monbiot

Envir­on­ment­al­ism is, or should be, a move­ment led by sci­entific find­ings. I see the role of envir­on­ment­al­ists as being to explore and explain the implic­a­tions of what the sci­ence – whether on cli­mate change, hab­itat loss, biod­iversity, fish­er­ies, pol­lu­tion or resource deple­tion — is say­ing, and how this should trans­late into pub­lic policy.

Scientists: world is on the brink

2500 sci­ent­ists attend­ing a recent con­fer­ence in Copen­ha­gen have warned we face irre­vers­ible cli­mate change.

Lewis Smith, writ­ing for The Aus­tralarian:

The demands and alerts con­tained in the state­ment were described as a defin­ing moment in sci­ent­ists’ rela­tions with polit­ical lead­ers, rep­res­ent­ing a shift away from their tra­di­tional role of merely offer­ing advice to telling politi­cians to act.

Pace of climate change exceeds estimates

Pace of cli­mate change exceeds estim­ates:

We are basic­ally look­ing now at a future cli­mate that’s bey­ond any­thing we’ve con­sidered ser­i­ously in cli­mate model sim­u­la­tions,” Chris­topher Field, found­ing dir­ector of the Carne­gie Institution’s Depart­ment of Global Eco­logy at Stan­ford Uni­ver­sity, said.

… emis­sions from burn­ing fossil fuels since 2000 have largely out­paced the estim­ates used in the U.N. panel’s 2007 reports.

Unex­pec­tedly large amounts of car­bon diox­ide are being released into the atmo­sphere as the res­ult of “feed­back loops” that are speed­ing up nat­ural processes.