What U.S. “justice” signifies around the world

I’ve long been a fer­vent critic of the U.S. but it wasn’t always this way. The fer­vour came about from a real­isa­tion that much of what I was led to believe about Amer­ica as a child was a lie. I don’t have the same fer­vour when it comes to abus­ive powers like China and Rus­sia. I wasn’t con­stantly bar­raged with the notion that these coun­tries are the greatest nations ever to have graced the planet with their pres­ence. It’s a high expect­a­tions, low out­comes kind of a thing.

And so to the latest example of Amer­ican hypo­crisy. While the U.S. preaches to the world about justice and free­dom it is renowned for the opposite:

It’s quite not­able that the mere threat of end­ing up in Amer­ican cus­tody is con­sidered (at least by Assange’s law­yers) to be a viable basis for con­test­ing extra­di­tion on human rights grounds. Indeed, this argu­ment is not unusual.

Indeed, almost every per­son I’ve spoken who has or had any­thing to do with WikiLeaks expresses one fear above all oth­ers: the pos­sib­il­ity that they will end up in Amer­ican cus­tody and sub­jec­ted to its law­less War on Ter­ror “justice sys­tem.” Amer­ic­ans still like to think of them­selves as “lead­ers of the free world,” but in the eyes of many, it’s exactly the “free world” to which Amer­ican policies are so anti­thet­ical and threatening.

Add Your Comments

Disclaimer
Your email is never published nor shared.
Required
Required
Tips

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <ol> <ul> <li> <strong>

Ready?